My Photo

Email HMIL

  • teapot DOT tantrums AT gmail DOT com

July 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Terms of Use

COBRA

Think About It ...

  • **GANDALF THE WHITE said...
    "Other evils there are that may come... Yet it is not our part to master all the tides of the world, but to do what is in us for the succor of those years wherein we are set, uprooting the evil in the fields that we know, so that those who live after may have clean earth to till. What weather they shall have is not ours to rule"
  • **JOHN STUART MILL SAID**...
    "A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight; nothing he cares about more than his own personal safety is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by exertions of better men than himself."

Blogs for Thompson

  • I'mWithFred - Contribute Now

Don't Be a Dhimmi, Dummy!

  • I Will NOT Submit!!!

101st Fighting Keyboardists

Anti-PC League

Stand up and be counted

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 10/2005

Thursday, July 03, 2008

C'mon, Senator Smith - You Haven't Convinced Me Yet!

I was invited and went to a “BBQ” last night where we were supposed to get to meet Republican Senator Gordon Smith. I hoped he would be willing to take questions, too.

He never ventured to the side of the patio where we sat, when he finally did get ready to speak, he was introduced by former Labor Commissioner (I think) Jack Roberts, who spoke for five minutes or more about what Gordon Smith would do, how Gordon Smith would vote, where Gordon Smith would stand. When Sen. Smith finally spoke, he acknowledged that he has recently done a lot of voting in ways that many of his constituents had problems with, kind of bragged about “working across party lines for the good of Oregon”, built good working relationships with Democrats, yada yada yada ad nauseum.

What I didn’t hear was Gordon Smith saying how he would vote, Gordon Smith saying what he would do, Gordon Smith saying where he would stand … for the benefit of Republicans and the values of those who re-elected him to national office. Nope, he said for the umpteenth time, “you need to vote for me because Oregon will be a lot worse off if you let Jeff Merkely win instead. We’re a lot different, and he will hurt Oregon and not stand with Republicans.” (ok, I’m paraphrasing here, but you get the idea…..)

Call me jaded, but it seems like he let a ‘surrogate’ say positive things about what he will supposedly do in standing with Republicans instead of being on the record himself saying things he might have to explain to his more liberal friends and compatriots back in DC.

And it seems to me that, contrary to his statement, because he’s been voting with the liberal dems so very often, whether it’s him in the Senate or Jeff Merkely, Oregon Republicans will still not be represented. The people who have been voting for him have not been served by someone who stand with them and their values.

Gordon Smith spoke for barely 10 minutes and said nothing of substance. He didn't offer to take any questions. He made a fairly quick getaway.

Gordon Smith didn’t convince me to give him my vote, and although several of my COBRA compatriots and local Republican movers and shakers will try to cajole me to act otherwise "for the good of the party", I may be an undervote for Sen. Smith this time around. I can't vote for the man in good conscience, ‘cause I no longer respect him.

C'mon, Senator Smith. Give me a reason to vote for you, huh?

Maybe the Republicans in Oregon should get off their collective butts and find a capable candidate that will actually represent the values of his/her constituents ... remembering that while Democrats are continually demanding that Republicans work with them, they rarely ever make the compromises themselves.

Monday, June 30, 2008

Is It Real? Or is it Memorex? (Or Is it a FAKE Birth Certificate????)

This was the subject of a lot of discussion in my current favorite forum, "The McCain Ravelry" ... whether or not the birth certificate produced by the Obama campaign is real or fake.

Looking at my own certified birth certificate copy, I noticed that it lacks "vital statistics" records that most birth certificates traditionally have, like the number of live and still births, the birth dates, ages and occupations of the parents, the stamp & certified signature. To me, it was obvious that the copy provided by the campaign was a phony. But NOooooooo.... the Obama campaign insists that it's the true copy.

Remember, when you complete the birth certificate, you don't get to keep the original ... it goes to the county registrar's office. If you want a copy, you apply for just that ... a COPY! In order for the copy proferred by the ObaMinions to be certified/valid, it would have to have some of those features.

Well, I wasn't the only one in my group who looked at it cross-eyed (that and the fact that the Fight the Smears website provided just a very small graphic of the document so you couldn't see many details), and it seems now that we weren't the only ones. Check out the post at IsraelInsider and take a look for yourself, and see what some "officials" in the appropriate departments in Hawaii have to say about it.

An authentic Hawaiian birth certificate for another Hawaiian individual has since surfaced which, using the same official form as the presumptive Obama certificate, includes an embossed official seal and an authoritative signature, coming through from the back. Obama's alleged certificate lacks those features, and the certificate number referencing the birth year has been blacked out, making it untraceable.

....

So if he were registered as being born in Hawaii, Barack Obama -- because only he or another member of his immediate family could by law request a "Certification of Live Birth" -- must have a certified paper copy, with embossed stamp and seal, or he could request one. But what his campaign has put forward as genuine, according to the senior spokesman in the relevant department of the State of Hawaii, is not in fact a certified copy. It is not valid.

Whereas the uncertified Obama document provides the date "filed by registrar", the certified DeCosta document provides the date "accepted by the registrar." The difference between filing an application for a Certification of Live Birth and having it accepted may be key here.

...

There is one possibility, however, which alone might justify the risk that Obama and his campaign seems to be taking in putting forward the uncertified document image: Obama was not in fact born in Hawaii and may not be an American citizen at all, or at least not a "natural born citizen" as the Constitution defines the requirement for the nation's chief executive. Real original birth certificates, circa 1961, have all kinds of verifiable information that would confirm Obama's origins, or throw them into doubt should they be lacking.

Research has since uncovered the law, in force at the time of Obama's birth, that were he to have been born in another country, his young American mother's youth extended time abroad would not suffice to make him a "natural born citizen." Even if he were naturalized later -- and there is no evidence that he was -- he would not be eligible to run for the office of president and -- if forgery or misrepresentation were involved -- he and his staffers might find themselves facing stiff federal and state charges.
...

But now the State of Hawaii has dashed those hopes by clarifying that a certified birth certificate must have an embossed seal and signature, features his claimed birth certificate image lack.

The longer Obama waits, the graver grow the consequences of waiting.

and then there's an update, of course (from 6/26) ...

Janice Okubo, in response to an Israeli Insider question on Tuesday, would not confirm nor deny whether she had told a St. Petersburg Times reporter whether she had said the birth certificate was "real", citing the statutory stipulation that "Hawaii state law (HRS §338-18) prevents disclosure of information contained in vital statistics records except to those people who have a direct and tangible interest in the record as defined by statute." This would, however, seem to negate the propriety of any disclosure by her of confidential information.

....................

Contrasting the purported Obama image with the DeCosta sample, it is hard to imagine the embossed seal and signature being of such light pressure that they would become completely invisible. An inked date of June 6, 2007, in reverse, does come through. But in any event, Okubo's confirmation that the premsumptive birth certificate is lacking the required stamps makes it all the more imperative for Obama to release the original paper certification, the only valid kind, and not an easy-to-photoshop electronic facsimile thereof. It should not be hard to produce, since Hawaii provides for family members to request them.

Even though Geraghy notes that Obama "initially refused to provide his birth certificate," he has suggested that it is "rather unlikely" that Obama was born in Kenya, since it would require that the candidate and his family do a lot of lying. In fact, there were reports of Kenyati relatives claiming he was born there, and there is the mysterious disappearance of his grandmother, who may indeed know something about this subject.

After all, being born in Hawaii is part of the "family legend" and it would be unreasonable to expect this to vary from interview to interview, especially when a non-Hawaiian birth would invalidate Obama's run for the presidency.

It is indeed hard to believe that Obama could have gone through his life without having to prove that he was an American citizen. But the credulity with which the mainstream media has automatically accepted as valid the image that appears on the radical left Daily Kos blog and on the Obama campaign's polemical "Fight the Smears" website makes it clear that many have been unwilling, now and in the past, to demand proof of an authentic document. They prefer to accept on faith that the candidate or his campaign would not lie about such a thing, assuming he has nothing to hide and no motive to lie.

But until the certified paper birth document is produced -- either by media pressure or a legal challenge in any state -- the fact remains that Obama has not proven that he is a "natural born citizen" eligible to be President according to the Constitution.




Maybe we should check out what the guy who faked the President Bush/ANG letters has been up to ... or some of his compatriots ... no, never mind ... they've been faking documents.

And they think we look stoooopid.

Censorship or Not? You Be the Judge ...

In the past Google has helped the Chinese government block web sites that they deem inappropriate for their citizens to access. This same Google, its said, is now scrubbing its search results to block your access to sites they disagree with, specifically web sites that don't fawn on BaRockStar D'Ohbama the way they do ... kind of like the way I and the rest of the COBRA gang don't ... Google doesn't want you to know. They want you to believe the way they and the LameStream Media do .. that D'Ohbama is the ObaMessiah and that he and his ObaMinions can do no wrong.

Not only do they scrub their search results (who knows what else they're blocking? well, we probably don't and won't 'cause they don't want us to know), but now have they taken it a step further? (Read Max's post and the comments)

Under the guise of "protecting the public from spam web sites", it appears that Google had begun shutting down its web sites with a decidedly anti-Obama bent. The specific seven in question are:

It sure seemed so. Would a company that helps the Chinese with their censorship policy and scrubs search results in the US hesitate to quietly censor web sites they disagree with? ... heck, with sites in direct opposition to their corporate choices. Well, it's been all over the net that it was the case ... but it appears that people have jumped to conclusions a little too soon.

Newsbusters gives an update to the original post here, and it now seems that rather than being a direct decision on Google's part, it may have actually been the concerted effort of ObaMinions. Dang the ObaMinions!

Come a Long Way has this update as well. I'm having a hard time getting my links to work tonight, but check out the links and determine what you think for yourself.

Obama Fans -- Just How Well Do You Know the Rock Star???

It is always interesting to me to read the viewpoint of someone like Bill Brown.

Bill Brown, is a highly respected retired member of the Billy Graham team. So, I take his assessment of Obama very seriously and for that reason accept his challenge to pass this on. I share his concern about the “rock star” image Obama has and watch with growing concern at the celebrity status the media has foisted upon him. Here is hope this email informs you in a wise way.
________________________________

The Obama Tidal Wave

We are witnessing a political phenomenon with Barack Obama of rare magnitude..

His speeches have inspired millions and yet most of his followers have no idea of what he stands for except platitudes of “Change” or that he says he will be a “Uniter”.

The power of speech from a charismatic person truly can be a powerful thing. Certainly Billy Graham had charisma and both his manner of speech and particularly the content changed millions.

On the extreme other hand, the charisma of Adolph Hitler inspired millions and the results were catastrophic.

Barack Obama certainly is no Hitler or a Billy Graham, but for many Americans out there feeling just like a surfer who might be ecstatic and euphoric while riding a tidal wave, the real story is what happens when it hits shore.

Just Some of What Defines Barack Obama:

  • He voted against banning partial birth abortion.
  • He voted no on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions.
  • Supports affirmative action in Colleges and Government.
  • In 2001 he questioned harsh penalties for drug dealing.
  • Says he will deal with street level drug dealing as minimum wage affair.
  • Admitted marijuana and cocaine use in high school and in college.
  • His religious convictions are very murky.
  • He is willing to meet with Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, Kim Jung Il and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
  • Has said that one of his first goals after being elected would be to have a conference with all Muslim nations.
  • Opposed the Patriot Act.
  • First bill he signed that was passed was campaign finance reform.
  • Voted No on prohibiting law suits against gun manufacturers.
  • Supports universal health-care.
  • Voted yes on providing habeas corpus for Guantanamo detainees.
  • Supports granting driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants.
  • Supports extending welfare to illegal immigrants.
  • Voted yes on comprehensive immigration reform.
  • Voted yes on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security.
  • Wants to make the minimum wage a “living wage”.
  • Voted with Democratic Party 96 percent of 251 votes.
  • Is a big believer in the separation of church and state.
  • Opposed to any efforts to Privatize Social Security and instead supports increasing the amount of tax paid.
  • He voted No on repealing the Alternative Minimum Tax.
  • He voted No on repealing the “Death” Tax.
  • He wants to raise the Capital Gains Tax.
  • Has repeatedly said the surge in Iraq has not succeeded….
  • He is ranked as the most liberal Senator in the Senate today and that takes some doing.

If your political choices are consistent with Barack Obama and you think that his positions will bring America together or make it a better place, then you will probably enjoy the ride and not forward this Email. If you are like most Americans that after examining what he stands for, are truly not in line with his record, it would be prudent to get off the wave or better yet, never get on, before it comes on shore and undermines the very foundations of this great Country. We have limited time to save America or the Supreme Court as we know it.

Inaction is action. If you agree this is important, pass it on. The mainstream media will not do it for you!

Bill Brown

MAY GOD BLESS YOU AND YOURS . .

Friday, June 27, 2008

The "Historical Significance" of the Middle East Today

Many readers may wish to ignore or refute the following essay by Raymond S. Craft, but there's no doubt that it will provoke much thought and hopefully a lot of discussion. Here is the essay that email correspondent Mr2Ears2 sent recently:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Some of you are not old enough to remember that nearly every family in america was grossly affected by WWII.  Most of you don't remember the rationing of meat, shoes, gasoline, and sugar. No tires for our automobiles, and a speed limit of 35 miles an hour on the road, not to mention, no new automobiles.  Read this and think about how we would react to being taken over by foreigners in 2008.

This is an EXCELLENT essay. Well thought out and presented.


Please read it all and think seriously about our future here on earth.  It is critical.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Historical Significance

By Raymond S. Craft

Sixty-three years ago, Nazi Germany had overrun almost all of Europe and hammered England to the verge of bankruptcy and defeat. The Nazis had sunk more than 400 British ships in their convoys between England and America taking food and war materials.

At that time the US was in an isolationist, pacifist mood, and most Americans wanted nothing to do with the European or the Asian war.

Then along came Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, and in outrage Congress unanimously declared war on Japan, and the following day on Germany, who had not yet attacked us. It was a dicey thing. We had few allies.

France was not an ally, as the Vichy government of France quickly aligned itself with its German occupiers. Germany was certainly not an ally, as Hitler was intent on setting up a Thousand Year Reich in Europe. Japan was not an ally, as it was well on its way to owning and controlling all of Asia .

Together, Japan and Germany  had long-range plans of invading Canada and Mexico, as launching pads to get into the United States over our northern and southern borders, after they finished gaining control of Asia and Europe .

America's only allies then were England, Ireland, Scotland, Canada, Australia, and Russia. That was about it. All of Europe, from Norway to Italy (except Russia in the East) was already under the Nazi heel.

The US was certainly not prepared for war. The US had drastically downgraded most of its military forces after WW I because of the depression, so that at the outbreak of WW II, Army units were training with broomsticks, because they didn't have guns, and cars with 'tank' painted on the doors, because they didn't have real tanks. A huge chunk of our Navy had just been sunk or damaged at Pearl Harbor .

Britain had already gone bankrupt, saved only by the donation of $600 million in gold bullion in the Bank of England (that was actually the property of Belgium ) given by Belgium to England to carry on the war, when Belgium was overrun by Hitler (a little known fact).

Actually, Belgium surrendered after one day, because it was unable to oppose the German invasion, and the Germans bombed Brussels into rubble the next day just to prove they could .

Britain had already been holding out for two years in the face of staggering losses and the near decimation of its Royal Air Force in the Battle of Britain, and was saved from being overrun by Germany, only because Hitler made the mistake of thinking the Brit's were a relatively minor threat that could be dealt with later. Hitler, first turned his attention to Russia, in the late summer of 1940, at a time when England was on the verge of collapse.

Ironically, Russia saved America's butt by putting up a desperate fight for two years, until the US got geared up to begin hammering away at Germany.

Russia lost something like 24,000,000 people in the sieges of Stalingrad and Moscow alone . . . 90% of them from cold and starvation, mostly civilians, but also more than a 1,000,000 soldiers.

Had Russia surrendered, Hitler would have been able to focus his entire war effort against the Brit's, then America. If that had happened, the Nazis could possibly have won the war.

All of this has been brought out to illustrate that turning points in history are often dicey things. Now, we find ourselves at another one of those key moments in history.

There is a very dangerous minority in Islam that either has, or wants, and may soon have, the ability to deliver small nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons, almost anywhere in the world.

The Jihadist, the militant Muslims, are basically Nazis in Kaffiyahs -- they believe that Islam, a radically conservative form of Wahhabi Islam, should own and control the Middle East first, then Europe, then the world. To them, all who do not bow to their will of thinking should be killed, enslaved, or subjugated. They want to finish the Holocaust, destroy Israel, and purge the world of Jews. This is their mantra. (goal)

There is also a civil war raging in the Middle East -- for the most part not a hot war, but a war of ideas. Islam is having its Inquisition and its Reformation, but it is not yet known which side will win -- the Inquisitors, or the Reformationists.

If the Inquisition wins, then the Wahhabis, the Jihadist, will control the Middle East, the OPEC oil, and the US, European, and Asian economies.

The techno-industrial economies will be at the mercy of OPEC -- not an OPEC dominated by the educated, rational Saudis of today, but an OPEC dominated by the Jihadist.  Do you want gas in your car?  Do you want heating oil next winter? Do you want the dollar to be worth anything? You had better hope the Jihad, the Muslim Inquisition, loses, and the Islamic Reformation wins.

If the Reformation movement wins, that is, the moderate Muslims, who believe that Islam can respect and tolerate other religions, live in peace with the rest of the world, and move out of the 10th century into the 21st, then the troubles in the Middle East will eventually fade away. A moderate and prosperous Middle East will emerge.

We have to help the Reformation win, and to do that we have to fight the Inquisition, i.e., the Wahhabi movement, the Jihad, Al Qaeda and the Islamic terrorist movements. We have to do it somewhere. We can't do it everywhere at once. We have created a focal point for the battle at a time and place of our choosing .. in Iraq. Not in New York, not in London, or Paris or Berlin, but in Iraq, where we are doing two important things.

(1) We deposed Saddam Hussein. Whether Saddam Hussein was directly involved in the 9/11 terrorist attack or not, it is undisputed that Saddam has been actively supporting the terrorist movement for decades. Saddam was a terrorist! Saddam was a weapon of mass destruction, responsible for the deaths of probably more than a 1,000,000 Iraqis and 2,000,000 Iranians.

(2) We created a battle, a confrontation, a flash point, with Islamic terrorism in Iraq. We have focused the battle. We are killing bad people, and the ones we get there, we won't have to get here. We also have a good shot at creating a democratic, peaceful Iraq, which will be a catalyst for democratic change in the rest of the Middle East, and an outpost for a stabilizing American military presence in the Middle East for as long as it is needed.

WW II, the war with the Japanese and German Nazis, really began with a 'whimper' in 1928. It did not begin with Pearl Harbor. It began with the Japanese invasion of China. It was a war for fourteen years before the US joined it. It officially ended in 1945 -- a 17-year war -- and was followed by another decade of US occupation in Germany and Japan to get those countries reconstructed and running on their own again -- a 27-year war.

WW II cost the United States an amount equal to approximately a full year's GDP -- adjusted for inflation, equal to about $12 trillion dollars. WW II cost America more than 400,000 soldiers killed in action, and nearly 100,000 still missing in action.

The Iraq war has, so far, cost the United States about $160,000,000,000, which is roughly what the 9/11 terrorist attack cost New York. It has also cost about 4,000 American lives, which is roughly equivalent to lives that the Jihad killed (within the United States ) in the 9/11 terrorist attack.

The cost of not fighting and winning WW II would have been unimaginably greater -- a world dominated by Japanese Imperialism and German Nazism.

This is not a 60-Minutes TV show, or a 2-hour movie in which everything comes out okay. The real world is not like that. It is messy, uncertain, and sometimes bloody and ugly. It always has been, and probably always will be.

The bottom line is that we will have to deal with Islamic terrorism until we defeat it, whenever that is. It will not go away if we ignore it.

If the US can create a reasonably democratic and stable Iraq, then we have an ally, like England, in the Middle East, a platform, from which we can work to help modernize and moderate the Middle East. The history of the world is the clash between the forces of relative civility and civilization, and the barbarians clamoring at the gates to conquer the world.

The Iraq War is merely another battle in this ancient and never ending war. Now, for the first time ever,the barbarians are about to get nuclear weapons. Unless somebody prevents them from getting them! 

We have four options:

1 . We can defeat the Jihad now, before it gets nuclear weapons.

2 . We can fight the Jihad later, after it gets nuclear weapons (which may be as early as next year, if Iran's progress on nuclear weapons is what Iran claims it is).

3 . We can surrender to the Jihad and accept its dominance in the Middle East now; in Europe in the next few years or decades, and ultimately in America, France and Germany and possibly most of the rest of Europe. It will, of course, be more dangerous, more expensive, and much bloodier.

If you oppose this war, I hope you like the idea that your children, or grandchildren, may live in an Islamic America under the Mullahs and the Sharia, an America that resembles Iran today.

The history of the world is the history of civilization clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.

Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.

Remember, perspective is everything, and America's schools teach too little history for perspective to be clear, especially in the young American mind.

The Cold War lasted from about 1947, at least until the Berlin Wall came down in 1989; forty-two years!

Europe spent the first half of the 19th century fighting Napoleon, and from 1870 to 1945 fighting Germany!

World War II began in 1928, lasted 17 years, plus a ten year occupation, and the US still has troops in Germany and Japan .. World War II resulted in the death of more than 50,000,000 people, maybe more than 100,000,000 people, depending on which estimates you accept.

The US has taken more than 3,000 killed in action in Iraq. The US took more than 4,000 killed in action on the morning of June 6, 1944, the first day of the Normandy Invasion to rid Europe of Nazi Imperialism. 

In WW II, the US averaged 2,000 KIA a week -- for four years. Most of the individual battles of WW II lost more Americans than the entire Iraq war has done so far.

The stakes are at least as high. A world dominated by representative governments with civil rights, human rights, and personal freedoms -- or a world dominated by a radical Islamic Wahhabi movement, by the Jihad, under the Mullahs and the Sharia (Islamic law).

It's difficult to understand why the average American does not grasp this. They favor human rights, civil rights, liberty and freedom, but evidently not for Iraqis.

'Peace Activists' always seem to demonstrate here in America, where it's safe.

Why don't we see Peace Activist demonstrating in Iran, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, North Korea, in the places that really need peace activism the most?  I'll tell you why! They would be killed!

The liberal mentality is supposed to favor human rights, civil rights, democracy, multiculturalism, diversity, etc., but if the Jihad wins, wherever the Jihad wins, it is the end of civil rights, human rights, democracy, multiculturalism, diversity, etc.

Americans who oppose the liberation of Iraq are coming down on the side of their own worst enemy!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Raymond S. Kraft is a writer and an attorney living in Northern California that has studied the Middle Eastern culture and religion


Who Does This Remind You Of???

Besides Eddie Murphy, does this remind you of anyone else we've seen in the news a lot?

Friday, June 13, 2008

Media Bloodhounds Have Morphed Into Media Poodles

OK, where's the media? You know ... the hard-hitting journalists that ferret out everything from the identity of "Deep Throat" to the hiding place of the topless celebrities? These same men and women who report on President Bush's every slight mispronunciation? (Even as Obama's many, Many, MANY recent "mis-speaks" have gotten a blatant pass.)

WHERE IS THE REAL MEDIA??

The Media out there today has been taking the 'hate Bush' steroids for so long that they no longer have any (pardon me) 'stones' ... y'know?

Personally, I think the media has bought into the typical media crap about feeling good about oneself, making nice in order to get "access", and being afraid to be looked at as racist.

Damn it! You can disagree with someone's policy positions and not be racist!

Rather than being the bloodhounds of old that would run a story to ground, the media has become the pampered poodles of the rich who are spoiled and want to stay that way, no matter the cost.  Throw them some foie gras ... their teeth aren't strong enough for raw meat ... unless it's the meat of an elephant, and then they channel some feral beast ... temporarily.

Mr2Ears2 sent me an email with the text shown below. The article by Rich Carroll has been posted all over the 'Net, but I thought I'd like to "Free as an Eagle" 'cause from what I've seen so far, he seems to be a decent guy I can agree with. (Be sure to read the comments.)

I'd love to know what you think, so please be sure to share your comments.

The Jihad Candidate
by Rich Carroll

Conspiracy theories make for interesting novels when the storyline is not so absurd that it can grasp our attention. 'The Manchurian Candidate' and 'Seven Days in May' are examples of plausible chains of events that captures the reader's imagination at best-seller level. 'What if' has always been the solid grist of fiction.

Get yourself something cool to drink, find a relaxing position, but before you continue, visualize the television photos of two jet airliners smashing into the Twin Towers in lower Manhattan and remind yourself this cowardly act of Muslim terror was planned for eight years.

How long did it take Islam and their oil money to find a candidate for President of the United States? As long as it took them to place a Senator from Illinois and Minnesota? The same amount of time to create a large Muslim enclave in Detroit? The time it took them to build over 2,000 mosques in America? The same amount of time required to place radical wahabbist clerics in our military and prisons as 'chaplains'?

Find a candidate who can get away with lying about their father being a 'freedom fighter' when he was actually part of the most corrupt and violent government in Kenya's history. Find a candidate with close ties to The Nation of Islam and the violent Muslim overthrow in Africa, a candidate who is educated among white infidel Americans but hides his bitterness and anger behind a superficial toothy smile. Find a candidate who changes his American name of Barry to the Muslim name of Barack Hussein Obama, and dares anyone to question his true ties under the banner of 'racism'. Nurture this candidate in an atmosphere of anti-white American teaching and surround him with Islamic teachers. Provide him with a bitter, racist, anti-white, anti-American wife, and supply him with Muslim middle east connections and Islamic monies. Allow him to be clever enough to get away with his anti-white rhetoric and proclaim he will give $834 billion taxpayer dollars to the Muslim controlled United Nations for use in Africa.

Install your candidate in an atmosphere of deception, because questioning him on any issue involving Africa or Islam would be seen as 'bigoted racism'; two words too powerful to allow the citizenry to be informed of facts. Allow your candidate to employ several black racist Nation of Islam Louis Farrakhan followers as members of his Illinois Senatorial and campaign staffs.

Where is the bloodhound American 'free press' who doggedly overturned every stone in the Watergate case? Where are our nation's reporters that have placed every Presidential candidate under the microscope of detailed scrutiny; the same press who pursue Bush's 'Skull and Bones' club or ran other candidates off with persistent detective and research work? Why haven't 'newsmen' pursued the 65 blatant lies told by this candidate during the Presidential primaries? Where are the stories about this candidate's cousin and the Muslim butchery in Africa? Since when did our national press corps become weak, timid, and silent? Why haven't they regaled us with the long list of socialists and communists who have surrounded this 'out of nowhere' Democrat candidate or the fact that his church re-printed the Hamas Manifesto in their bulletin, and that his 'close pastor friend and mentor' met with Middle East terrorist Muammar Qaddafi, (Guide of the First of September Great Revolution of the Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya)? Why isn't the American press telling us this candidate is supported by every Muslim organization in the world?

As an ultimate slap in the face, be blatant in the fact your candidate has ZERO interest in traditional American values and has the most liberal voting record in U.S. Senate history. Why has the American mainstream media clammed up on any negative reporting on Barak Hussein Obama? Why will they print Hillary Rodham Clinton's name but never write his middle name? Is it not his name? Why, suddenly, is ANY information about this candidate not coming from mainstream media, but from the blogosphere by citizens seeking facts and the truth? Why isn't our media connecting the dots with Islam? Why do they focus on 'those bad American soldiers' while Islam slaughters non-Muslims daily in 44 countries around the globe? Why does our media refer to Darfur as 'ethnic cleansing' instead of what it really is: Muslims killing non-Muslims! There is enough strange, anti-American activity surrounding Barack Hussein Obama to pique the curiosity of any reporter. WHERE IS OUR INVESTIGATIVE MEDIA!?

A formal plan for targeting America was devised three years after the Iranian revolution in 1982. The plan was summarized in a 1991 memorandum by Mohammed Akram, an operative of the global Muslim Brotherhood. 'The process of settlement' of Muslims in America, Akram explained, 'is a civilization jihad process.' This means that members of the Brotherhood must understand that their work in 'America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah's religion is made victorious over all other religions.'

There is terrorism we can see, smell and fear, but there is a new kind of terror invading The United States in the form of Sharia law and finance. Condoning it is civilization suicide. Middle East Muslims are coming to America in record numbers and building hate infidel mosques, buying our corporations, suing us for our traditions, but they and the whole subject of Islam is white noise leaving uninformed Americans about who and what is really peaceful. Where is our investigative press? Any criticism of Islam or their intentions, even though Islamic leaders state their intentions daily around the globe, brings forth a volley of 'racist' from the left-wing Democrat crowd.

Lies and deception behind a master plan - the ingredients for 'The Manchurian Candidate' or the placement of an anti-American President in our nation's White House? Is it mere coincidence that an anti-capitalist run for President at the same time Islamic Sharia finance and law is trying to make advancing strides into the United States? Is it mere coincidence this same candidate wants to disarm our nuclear capability at a time when terrorist Muslim nations are expanding their nuclear weapons capability? Is it mere coincidence this candidate wants to reduce our military at a time of global jihad from Muslim nations?

Change for America? What change? To become another 'nation of Islam'?

© Rich Carroll 2008

Saturday, June 07, 2008

Post-Race, Post-Political, Post-Partisan -- Obama IS The Future

How could I have been so wrong? Of *Course* Obama is the future ... he Hopes he can Change our world.

Courtesy of my friend TravelingGal from Ravelry comes this inspiring look at our future with the ObaEmperor. I just wish I were better at getting the video to show up in here.

(I try to ignore the fact that it came from the Ron Paul campaign ... I really don't understand why they're still running ads, though)

Just When Did "My Favorite Things" Change So Much??

My mother sent me this .... what I want to know is when did I start finding this so funny ... and worry so much that I'm beginning to relate to it???

Julie Andrews at 69


To commemorate her birthday, actress/vocalist Julie Andrews made a special appearance at Manhattan's Radio City Music Hall for the benefit of the AARP. One of the musical numbers she performed was 'My Favorite Things' from the legendary movie 'Sound Of Music'. Here are the lyrics she used:


(If you sing it, its especially fun!!!)

Maalox and nose drops and needles for knitting,

Walkers and handrails and new dental fittings,

Bundles of magazines tied up in string,

These are a few of my favorite things.



Cadillacs and cataracts,and hearing aids and glasses,

Polident and Fixodent and false teeth in glasses,

Pacemakers, golf carts and porches with swings,

These are a few of my favorite things.



          When the pipes leak,When the bones creak,

          When the knees go bad,

          I simply remember my favorite things,

          And then I don't feel so bad.



Hot tea and crumpets and corn pads for bunions,

No spicy hot food or food cooked with onions,

Bathrobes and heating pads and hot meals they bring,

These are a few of my favorite things.



Back pain, confused brains and no need for sinnin',

Thin bones and fractures and hair that is thinnin',

And we won't mention our short shrunken frames,

When we remember our favorite things.



          When the joints ache, When the hips break,

          When the eyes grow dim,

          Then I remember the great life I've had,

          And then I don't feel so bad.



Ms. Andrews received a standing ovation from the crowd that lasted over four minutes and repeated encores.

Thursday, June 05, 2008

Some Stereotypes Are Meant to be Broken

On my new favorite home away from home, Ravelry, there are lots of interesting ladies, of all ages. (These ladies love Patrick Joubert Conlon of Born Again Redneck and think he should run for President based on his Conservative views! Hurray for Patrick….but sad for us ‘cause he was born off of our beautiful shores.)

This section of Ravelry was carved out by some conservative ladies as a haven for Conservative Knitters to get together and discuss things of interest to us, not just for everyone on Ravelry to come and discuss conservative topics. There have been interesting discussions, no flame wars, but plenty to make the blood pressure go up as people of other opinions try to come into the mix and stir up trouble, trying to make us defend and prove our opinions. We finally convinced them to agree to disagree and they’ve left, although I’m firmly convinced that they keep coming in to create whatever havoc they can.

Another fellow Conservative Knitter lady started a forum just for supporters of John McCain. (Yes, I admit he’s not my first choice, but then again, my first choice dropped out of the race way too early, so McCain is my candidate.) The most interesting thing about this forum is that it’s populated by McCain supporters of many stripes. There are older and younger; conservative, liberal and moderate; ex-(fill in the name of a Republican candidate) supporters; … and there are a lot of Hillary supporters. There are younger and older Hillary supporters, and they are very nice ladies. I’m sure we’ll have our disagreements from time to time, but I really like these ladies. We hear the stereotypes of bitter, man-hating femiNazis … but these ladies are in it and have blown my mind a little. Here in what I call Gdansk on the Willamette, most Hillary supporters are in your face and wild-eyed that you’d dare to be a conservative. But on our little Ravelry group, we’re united … in our desire to NOT see ObaMessiah in the White House.

One young gal, who is a woman of color and a college student at a very liberal college posted last night and I was very impressed by her post, so I asked her if I could share with y’all. She said I could, so here are her thoughts:

Hello everyone. This will probably be my only political topic that I will make on Ravelry (or anywhere else on the internet for the matter). Before I begin, I would like to thank you all for letting me speak my mind here. I don’t mind disagreement - in fact, I love when people can speak their own beliefs without being judged or treated unfairly, and I love when people can listen to people who disagree with them and still respect them - and I trust that you will respect me no matter what your beliefs may be.

I am a young liberal college-educated minority woman who wants McCain to be president. That alone is enough to stop people who I go to school with, who I work with, and who I live with in their tracks. I have told my preference of presidential candidate to a few close friends in private settings, and even the most open of them are surprised. However, in the midst of the Democratic candidates’ supporters, I am afraid to voice my beliefs.

Don’t get me wrong, I have good liberal friends and good conservative friends, and both types of people are willing to listen to me even if they disagree. I have the most problem, though, with liberals at my school who seek to shove their ideas down my throat.

In my experience, most liberal arts colleges in the United States are very liberal leaning. At my school in particular, I felt as if the liberal faculty and administration continues to force students to believe in liberal ideas. I am a liberal, but I don’t agree with some ideas in my school’s liberal mainstream. When I made my views known, respectfully and appropriately, in a seminar freshman year, I was ridiculed by the organizers, who were not students but staff members employed by the college. Yes, I am treated like trash because of my views, but that is nothing compared to what conservatives have to face at my school. I am always a person who loves when people of opposite viewpoints meet, listen, and discuss, but I feel that our school does not do that. I feel as if Republicans are continuing to be silenced and inappropriately threatened at our school. One person has confided to me that he has been kicked out of several jobs for making his conservative views known. I want to hear what conservatives have to say, but I understand why they are silent.

Back to the topic of supporting McCain on a college campus. I feel as if the liberal press tries to can my vote, saying that the “youth vote” and the “minority vote” are going towards another candidate, even though I feel that it is an insult to tell me that I have to vote their candidate since I am a young minority woman. What if I told people on campus that I wanted McCain to be president? To be honest, I fear my skin. I would be called a “traitor”, as if I supported their candidate in the first place - the word “traitor” assumes that you supported one group but then switched to another one, which is not accurate here since I never supported Obama or Clinton - but to be honest, that is the least of my worries. In my school, liberals get away with so many things that conservatives can only dream of doing. And considering how many things at my school happen behind closed doors, I fear the worst.

I am supporting McCain because, out of all the candidates, he has the most experience, integrity, and patriotism. I don’t agree completely with any of the major candidates, but that’s okay with me - people are individuals and shouldn’t have to feel pressured into fitting into either-or molds. But of all the major candidates who are running, McCain is the only one that I trust. He is honest about his beliefs, and he is willing to accept criticism. I admire how McCain handled himself when he was a prisoner of war. Can you say the same about the major Democratic candidates who are running?

Although I find Obama’s outlook, actions, and sincerity (or lack thereof) repulsive, I am not saying that Obama is the epitome of evil. I am saying that Obama is not someone who should be the president. Just as I am not the right type of person to be programming computers, Obama is not the right person to be leading this nation from the White House. He would make a great actor and a salesman, but I do not think he has the skills or the attitude to become the president. And everyone, including Obama, McCain, myself, and anyone in between, has weaknesses as well as strengths. In my opinion, Obama has a glaring weakness that makes me very hesitant to support his candidacy. Perhaps if Obama showed more personal responsibility instead of lying about/covering up his past, complaining like a three-year-old, deliberately supporting double standards, and unjustly blaming others, I might consider him. But he has not shown personal responsibility yet, and for that reason I cannot support him.

I may not know everything in the world, but one thing that I do know about is personal responsibility. I am a child abuse survivor, and for a majority of my life, I blamed my parents (my abusers) for all the problems I had in my life. As you’d expect, I didn’t get anywhere. Once I learned to take more responsibility for myself, I felt as if I took the drivers seat of my life from my abusers and gave it to myself. I learned about how lying makes my my future a problem, while telling the truth - to myself and others - puts the problem in the past. I am still learning about personal responsibility, and there are still times that I slip into the three-year-old mode, but I feel that taking personal responsibility of myself has freed me from the trauma from the past and allowed me to move forward in life.

And as personal responsibility has improved my life, I trust that a president with personal responsibility will improve the country. The only major presidential candidate who has a sense of personal responsibility is Senator John McCain, and that is why I, a young liberal college-educated minority woman, am supporting McCain.

I’d love to discuss, but please keep comments specifically to my post either in this thread or in private messages. I am not ready to show the world my true me yet. Thank you for listening. I feel as if a giant load has been lifted from my shoulders. I am excited to hear about your thoughts, so feel free to respond.

Personally, I have a lot more hope for the future of political discourse if these ladies are any example. Trying to deal with ObaManiacs, however … well … that’s another story.

Sunday, June 01, 2008

A Picture Says a Thousand Words

While many of us have the gift of gab and love to tell a good story, many times the point is well made with a simple picture. Here are a fine selection of both that I found on my Conservative Knitters forum on Ravelry.com, my new favorite hang-out (and part of the reason I'm not posting here as often these days, although I'm working toward getting into more jewelry making, too).


“Everyone is so concerned now where all of the candidates are born. McCain was born on a military base in Panama. Hillary was born outside Chicago, and if you believe the media, Barack Obama was born in a manger.” – Jay Leno

He Walks on Water


Easter Island Obama
 




Obama_the_one








































































Saturday Night Live's Amy Poehler pokes at Obama’s lack of experience:
“Senator Obama answered doubts about his inexperience by saying he has gained tremendous insight from his work as a community organizer, civil rights attorney, constitutional law professor, key club president, 4H treasurer, lunch room monitor, two years of jazz, and four years of tap.”

“You see Barack Obama at that rally surrounded by all those Kennedys? Man, I couldn’t tell if he was running for president or bartender.”
.

Empty Suit




























Barak Obama's Audition





















Elitist Obama

















 
Horton-hears-a-who




















Barak's Advisors
























And then there's his wife, who seems to think she's the same caliber as Jackie O, but from what I've seen to date, this Michelle Obama doesn't have the makings of a first lady, who is loathe to insert herself into politics, behaves with class, and lets the candidate/president be in the spotlight, while painstakingly keeping herself out of it, especially if it will cause controversy for her husband.

.
Who does she think she is already



































And how would we like the ObaMessiah's campaign to progress?

Obubble

Monday, May 26, 2008

Why Grown Men Shouldn't Have Action Figures

Why Men Shouldn't Have Action Figures

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Just 'Cause Someone's Offended, the UN Steps In???

Courtesy of Brit Hume & The Political Grapevine podcast:

“While anti-Semitism flourishes in the Middle East and Europe and racial genocide is underway in Africa, the United Nations has decided has decided to investigate racism in … America! The UN Special Rapporteur on racism, xenophobia, and intolerance is in the US for a three-week tour that will take him to several cities. The New York Sun reports the statement from the UN said that the investigator will look into whether racism plays a role in the presidential campaign and “other unidentified issues.” The US is officially welcoming the visit, but UN Ambassador Zelme Kalilzad says, “I think it’s important for the UN Human Rights council to spend its time on real problems and the problems of violations of human rights of countries that are notorious violators.”


Reuters has this (plus some interesting comments on the posting of the article on Free Republic):

GENEVA (Reuters) - A special U.N. human rights investigator will visit the United States this month to probe racism, an issue that has forced its way into the race to secure the Democratic Party's presidential nomination.
The United Nations said Doudou Diene would meet federal and local officials, as well as lawmakers and judicial authorities during the May 19-June 6 visit.
"The special rapporteur will...gather first-hand information on issues related to racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance," a U.N. statement said on Friday.
His three-week visit, at U.S. government invitation, will cover eight cities -- Washington D.C., New York, Chicago, Omaha, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Miami and San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Race has become a central issue in the U.S. election cycle because Sen. Barack Obama, the frontrunner in the battle for the Democratic nomination battle, stands to become the country's first African American president.
His campaign has increased turnout among black voters but has also turned off some white voters in a country with a history of slavery and racial segregation.
Diene, a Senegalese lawyer who has served in the independent post since 2002, will report his findings to the U.N. Human Rights Council next year.
However, the United Nations has almost no clout when it comes to U.S. domestic affairs and is widely perceived by many as interfering. The United States is not among the 47 member states of the Geneva-based forum, but has observer status.
In a report last year he said Islamophobia had grown worldwide since the September 11 2001 attacks on the United States, carried out by al-Qaeda militants.
DEATH PENALTY
A U.N. panel which examined the U.S. record on racial discrimination last March urged the United States to halt racial profiling of Americans of Arab, Muslim and South Asian descent and to ensure immigrants and non-nationals are not mistreated.
It also said America should impose a moratorium on the death penalty and stop sentencing young offenders to life in prison until it can root out racial bias from its justice system.
Racial minorities were more likely than whites to be sentenced to death or to life without parole as juveniles, according to the U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. It monitors compliance with an international treaty which Washington ratified in 1994.
U.S. officials told the body, made up of 18 independent experts, that they were combating hate crimes such as displays of hangman's nooses and police brutality against minorities.
Some 800 racially motivated incidents against people perceived to be Arab, Muslim, Sikh or South Asian had been investigated since the September 11 attacks, they said at the time.
Substantial progress had been made over the years in addressing disparities in housing, education, employment and health care, according to a U.S. report submitted to the talks.
(Additional reporting by Matt Bigg in Atlanta; Editing by Jonathan Lynn and Jon Boyle)
***

This is the same organization that can’t bother to look at what’s happening in Darfur and say it's genocide? This is the same organization that looked askance at the whole Bosnia/Serbia debacle until it was way too late. This is the same organization that let the Hutus and Tutsis go at each other with wholesale slaughter, and didn't see a need to get involved.

This self same organization needs to get involved in the US because "someone's offended".

Seems to me that the UN will be a great stepping stone for Antichrist, when the time comes.

I'm just sayin'........

***

The Apostate President? Well, That Depends....

There are those in our country that are convinced that BaRockStar the ObaMessiah is Muslim. Look at his middle name -- Hussein -- after all, they say. So what?? (President Bush's middle name is Walker, but I'm pretty sure he likes to jog and ride a bike.) His middle name has nothing to do with his identity, we're told by his supporters. He's **Not** a Muslim, they cry ... "He's a Christian!" they say. It's not my place to pass judgment, but it seems to me that if it didn't mean enough to him to cry foul when his former pastor was preaching hate, he's either a very lackadaisical Christian, or he was just there out of political expediency and learned to sleep with his eyes open.

But ... He's NOT a Muslim!!! If you say that, well, you're hateful and Islamaphobic. (Actually, I AM Radical Islamaphobic ... they scare the crap out of me and I'd like to keep my head attached to my body, thank you very much!)

Well, that's true ... and at the same time it's not true ... depending on who you talk to.

Born of a Muslim father (who rejected the faith), Obama is still considered to be Muslim from birth by Muslims around the planet. However, because Obama also willingly “left the faith” when he accepted Christianity, this makes him an apostate Muslim, which means he must be executed.

Now, hold on there, Big Fella ... don't get you knickers all up in a twist! I'm NOT calling for anyone to off the ObaMeister ... far from it ... I'm just pointing out what the mindset is of these people he **wants** to deal with as our president.

Muslim Sharia law states that the penalty for a male Muslim apostate (someone sane leaving the faith other than under duress) is death, typically by beheading. (Apparently, however, there are differences of opinion on what should be done with female apostates .. some say to throw her in the slammer for life, and others just want to kill her.)  Apparently there is also no penalty for killing an apostate, and it is, in fact, encouraged. In addition, it is considered illegal by Sharia law to provide protection to an apostate.

All of this adds up to a security nightmare should Obama really truly want to “visit” a Muslim country and “talk” with the heads of terrorist Muslim states. Even though the leader of Hamas says they "like" him, in the eyes of the collective Muslim world, ObaMonster is a male apostate ... either that, or they believe him to be a closet Muslim, ready to grease the way for a Muslim invasion of our culture. (Newsflash ... the LameStream Media and the IntelLeftuals have been doing that for a long time now ... although I guess Barry could give it another nudge or two for good measure.)

Because it would be considered illegal for a Muslim male to offer an apostate male any protection of any kind, and is, in fact, encouraged to kill him (preferably by separating him from his head), the “security” teams from any Muslim “head of state” ObaMessiah would are to visit would be paying mere lip service to whatever protection he would be “offered” … when I said recently told friends that I thought Ahmadinejad would be happy to do the honors himself (if only in order to usher in the Mahdi), I probably wasn’t far off the mark – those who kill apostates are lauded!! and surely the Mahdi would give him a special place in Paradise...and maybe an extra virgin, too.

(Once again, I'm really not happy about having to become this familiar with this many Muslim terms & concepts ... I'm just sayin'.....)

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

What Mom's Say All Day -- Sung to the William Tell Overture

Received this in my email today and it made me giggle so hard I thought some of y'all should have to tinkle a little, too.

Saturday, May 10, 2008

I Didn't Have to Spend $104,655.60 to Tell You

Personally, I'm a Christian Conservative Republican -- in *that* order. Am I Perfect? NO. Do I strive to act according to my conscience for the betterment of my family and those around me? Yes!

I am a Christian in that I believe with my whole heart, mind, and soul in the teachings of Jesus Christ, that he is the Son of God and that he offered himself up as payment for my own sin when he didn't have to. I have accepted him as my savior and placed my hope in him for my afterlife. I believe he has gone to prepare a place for me with him in Heaven.

I am a Conservative in that I believe in traditional values. No, not like slavery, and bigotry, and taking advantage of the poor and things like that. Those are truly evil and should not be tolerated in our society and should never have been. I believe in the value of the family, in chastity until marriage, in the the sanctity of marriage (except in rare cases of extreme kinds of betrayal), in taking care of our kids and protecting them from the worst things in society and letting them be kids until it's time for them to start actually growing up, in the sanctity of life of all ages from the unborn to the elderly and infirm. I believe in holding down a job and providing for my family alongside my husband who does the same thing, and giving where I can and when I can ... although I often can't and wish I could more.

I am a Republican in that I believe in less government, lower taxes, free trade, open market.

Am I a hate monger, war lover, bigot, rich, greedy, elitist, superior, motivated by how much money I can take from the poor? Good Lord, NO! God forbid I should ever come across as trying to be superior to anyone else, because I damn well know that I'm not.

I am, however, very secure in my beliefs, having learned what I know and think and believe, and why ... to the point that I really don't feel like I have to explain myself to anyone because of it.

However, that said, my cousin sent me an email about a wealthy man from California, George Esseff, who paid $104,655.60 of his own money to run an advertisement in the Washington Post (a decidedly liberal paper if ever there was one) to explain exactly what that he's a Republican, proud to be one and why. Now, when I get emails like this, I like to check them out on Snopes.com to see if there's been anything "out there" that disproves it. For example, the whole Nancy Pelosi/Windfall Profits Tax (while I believe it's totally within the realm of possibility for San Fran Gran Nan) has been determined to be "urban legend" or "satire". Even so, I've chosen to keep it posted ... but with a disclaimer that Snopes.com has uncovered evidence to show that it's not entirely factual.

So, ready to go to Snopes.com on this "$104,655.60 ad" email .... but I see that someone has beat me to the punch ... and it's totally true. Turns out the man who placed the ad in 2004 is a wealthy man, but one that does a *lot* of good! As mentioned in Snopes, "I also discovered that when he noted that he has 'used [his] earnings to feed the poor, shelter the homeless, provide housing for the elderly and medical care for the sick,' he was not exaggerating -- among his may charitable efforts, George Esseff and his wife, Rosemary, donated over $1 million towards the construction of a low-income housing complex" in Thousand Oaks, California.

If you'd like to read the contents of this ad in a larger format, please go to http://www.whatiam.net/  and read it there. If you don't mind the smaller print, here we go:

You’re a Republican???

 

In today’s America, ask a growing number of high school and college students; their teachers and professors; the self-anointed media elite and/or hard working men and women of all ethnicities, the question, “What is a Republican?”, and you’ll be told “… a rich, greedy, egotistical individual, motivated only by money and the desire to accumulate more and more of it, at the expense of the environment … the working poor ….and all whom they exploit…”

 

I am a Republican … I am none of those things… and I don’t know any Republicans who are.

 

WHAT I AM … first and foremost, is a loving husband of some 52 plus years, the father of four and an American who’s proud of his country… and his country’s heritage.